The Decline Of Offensive Lines
Something’s been eating at me for several years now, and that thing has been Offensive lines. Maybe it’s because I watched my own team have a dominant one during the late 2000’s and then slowly but surely become a constant problem until it has now spent years as a catastrophe with no hope in sight. But it feels like offensive lines are just…getting worse. Worse and worse. The number of teams who could have a rightful claim to the worst line in the league is higher than the number of teams you could consider to have a genuinely good line. This is a problem I’ve seen discussed on the fringes of football forums and news outlets, but it remains a problem that I think is very stark and under-discussed.
Of course, the problem is profoundly complicated and seems to be driven by many slowly compounding factors. When I casually asked twitter why offensive lines are all bad now, pretty much every reply I got was a different answer, and all of them felt like valid answers. So let’s look at some of them.
An offensive line is a unit of many guys, not just one guy
Pretty easy explanation. We can look directly at the Giants for a good example of how one great player (Andrew Thomas) can’t make a line good. If Thomas stonewalls his man, the other 4 dudes still have to do their jobs, and that’s no guarantee. Finding enough actual good players to make a line functional is surprisingly difficult to do. But this isn’t really a modern problem but a problem that has always existed, and other modern factors are making it worse.
Reduced practice times
In the name of player safety in the wake of the concussion problems the league has drastically rolled back offseason activities and allowed padded practice. This has arguably done the most damage to linemen. Lineman arguably needed the most protection since their position has the most impacts, but they also needed the most practice, because they have to work as a unit. OLs need to know what everyone else on the line is doing to properly run the plays, and the less time they get to reach harmony, the worse they perform, especially out of the gate versus defenders who have a much simpler job of “get the man with the ball and eat him”.
Lack of depth
Kind of going with the first point, having 5 healthy guys at one time is hard. Having enough proper depth to cover the injuries along those lines is practically impossible. The Giants had a bad line to begin with and now most of those starters are out with injury.
Young QBs making lines look worse
Sacks are not always a line stat but often a QB stat. You think Sam Howell being on track to take more sacks than David Carr is entirely on the line? It’s frequently on him. You think the Giants line just magically started playing a bit better when Tyrod started instead of Jones? Jones holds onto the ball like Gollum holds the ring, Tyrod gets the ball out faster. Turning into a scramble machine has become part of most new QB skillsets and those guys naturally hold onto the ball longer, leaving themselves open longer. For the first time in a while, we have a massive youth movement at the QB position, and the quick-draw pocket passers of the Brady mold are quickly becoming an endangered species because now everyone playing grew up idolizing Mike Vick. Vick took a lot of sacks too, you kinda forget it because the fun youtube highlight videos never show the rest of his average play, which could be quite terrible.
It isn’t a sexy position
You can still make good money as an elite o-lineman, and even make decent money as a serviceable one as more and more teams desperately need those. But being a lineman is a thankless job. Only the smartest football dweebs understand your job and rarely will casual fans know your name. Think about every team in the league. How many celebrity offensive lineman can you name? Jason Kelce? Trent Williams? There’s a better chance you can name a team’s #3 WR before you can remember an o-lineman. It’s a thankless job, which means that anyone who is built for it but desires attention probably is going to focus on playing more visible and possibly lucrative positions like defensive end.
College isn’t a good training ground
College offenses are spread happy and fast, and they don’t need the in-the-ground grit much anymore. Also, due to college program recruiting discrepancies, often a “good” line is mostly just a bunch of guys who are just flat-out bigger and better than the opponent and can just steamroll dudes with size. Most players on Alabama’s line are going to look like all-pros when they play South Florida or Middle Tennessee. What are you learning about the position when you beat the snot out of some dimpy school who is there for the paycheck?
Offensive Line is hard, and is getting less and less fun
This is the reason that keeps coming back to me. Offensive lineman is a hard position to play, possibly the hardest position outside QB, so having such a thankless position also be stupid difficult is certainly going to turn potential players to other positions. But for the past 3 years my mind keeps wandering back to an article on Defector written by former college offensive line player Drew Magary. In it, he whines about pass blocking, especially compared to run blocking, and I think he unintentionally reveals what may be a major root of the problem which is this lumbering tree of bad offensive line play. Pass blocking is harder, and the league has become a pass-first league. Run blocking is fun, and pro-active. You get down in the dirt and you get to surge forward, imposing your will on the poor sap in front of you as you grapple. It’s simpler, even with fancy pulls and shifts, because the goal is PUSH. Push is simple. Push makes sense. Push is fun. Pass blocking is not proactive. It’s reactive. You don’t surge forward, you backpedal and brace and do a stupid grapple dance with the defender trying to slow him down long enough for the QB to do his thing. You don’t get to hit anybody, you don’t really get to impose your will, you are by definition just trying to be an effective roadblock for as long as possible. You are almost playing defense instead of offense. That doesn’t seem nearly as fun to me as shoving guys backwards with full force to create holes for your man to rush through. But pass blocking is the primary skill you need now as a lineman, even as a guard or center, because passing is all this league does.
Think about most of the dominant offensive lines we’ve had in the past decades. Philly, right now. Dallas back in the mid-late 2010s. The 49ers of the earlier 2010’s. Hell, the Giants in the late 2000’s. Pretty much all of the ones you can probably think of got that reputation…due to the run game. Philly loves to run the ball, to sneak the ball, to exploit Hurts and his legs. Dallas? They were blocking for Zeke and running Zeke down everyone’s throats as Dak was young and inexperienced or Romo was held together by duct tape. The 49ers were using Frank Gore like a slow and steady battering ram over and over. The 2008 Giants were famous for the 3-headed running attack of Earth Wind and Fire. Teams with good offensive lines seem to run the ball more, and more effectively. None of these lines got praise because they kept their QBs in a comfy pocket all the time (although they mostly could do that), it was running the ball.
Maybe we really just need a resurgence of the running game in the future sometime to bring back offensive lines. But offensive lines are just crumbling to pieces and I wonder how many major QB injuries we are away from some more major rule changes. If we lose Mahomes for a season to a sack, hell will be wrought upon us. Remember what happened when we lost Brady for a year.
The 2005 Seahawks with Walter Jones and Steve Hutchinson, now that was an offensive line for the ages.
One theory I heard too, which is related to OL not being fun but not quite the same thing, is that if you are a talented linesman being developed in high school or college, there is a tendency to push them to be defensive linesmen. A talented Defensive Linesmen has more ability to single handingly change the game (you just need one to break the play vs all five to defend it), less reliant on the overall quality of the unit, pays better, and is more fun to boot (you’re always trying to do something proactive, as you said). So there’s incentives both on the coaching and the player side to be DL rather than OL.
The end result is that linesman talent tends to go on the defensive side, which makes it even harder to field an offensive line. An OL coach has to scheme against guys who tend to be bigger and more athletically gifted. That’s always going to be hard. The one thing going for OLs is that blocking a big guy is conceptually easier than trying to run past a big guy that doesn’t want you to do so, so it does even out a bit there. Not trying to say playing OL is easier, it’s just that being on the defensive (which in the exchange of OL vs DL, technically yeah, the OL is defending against the DL, as counter intuitive as that sounds) in any conflict is going to lead to certain advantages vs the more proactive party.
There has been a substantial number of times when I thought to myself “Man, Dexter Lawrence would be a great O-lineman”. I wonder if that happened to him
I think the Giants right now would be willing to test that the way the season has been going for Dexter Lawrence and the O-Line
Given how highly regarded he was coming out of North Carolina as a college prospect (college scouts claimed he was the best high school prospect to ever come out of the state), I wouldn’t be surprised if this ever came up while he was growing up. He was definitely already playing DL in high school, but it could have easily came up at some point as a kid that “hey, you’re probably better off being a DL than an OL.” Unfortunately I’m not Dexter Lawrence so I can’t confirm it.
I went to high school with Cameron Erving, he played DL for us and FSU recruited him as such until his second year of college, where he converted to OL. He wasn’t having an impact on Defense prior to this. Grew into a 1st rounder in the 2015 draft as an OL, bounced around since then but currently with the ‘aints.
Kind of supports the argument about athletic skill stick on the DL.
This is an excellent point and I’d honestly say that this is the main reason we’ve seen such a massive dip in the quality of offensive lines. Speaking from low-level HS experience, oftentimes your OL is quite literally just a bunch of bigger dudes that aren’t fast/skilled enough to play any skill positions on offense, and aren’t particularly good on the DL. If it’s a small school then it’s just guys playing both ways and more often than not, those guys are going to inevitably pick playing along the DL at a higher level since it’s a much more glamourous (and more fun) position to play.
So in the end what you’re getting on the OL are leftovers. Guys that are playing that position because it’s the only position that they CAN play, rather than something that they’re extremely good at. Not to say that no one specializes in playing the OL period, but the vast majority probably tried other positions first before they were thrown in there. And if you weren’t already weeded out in High School, you will almost certainly get switched over in College. It’s to the point now that a lot of OL in college are just converted TEs and Fullbacks who were too big or unskilled to play those positions in college. And now we’re seeing it take effect in the NFL.
One other thing to consider is, how many teams today build around the trenches anymore? With the Eagles, this has been their philosophy since at least the Andy Reid days (he himself an O lineman while in college), they invest a ton of resources both on OL and DL. And that investment is not only limited to personnel, they made sure to bring top coaching as well: from Juan Castillo (let’s forget his stint as DC), from Howard Mudd, and now Jeff Stoutland. Hell, I can’t even name most of the current position coaches on the Eagles, but an average fan like me has sure known for a long time who our OL coach is.
I can only speak for the Giants, but I’m guessing the answer is LOTS of teams build around the trenches, it’s just that doing so successfully is hard. The Eagles currently have a great scouting department, so it’s not just that they are investing, they are investing wisely.
The Giants have spent the better part of the last 10 years making a concerted effort to fix the OL. They have invested high draft picks, low draft picks, big splash free agent signings, low cost veteran signings. And with the exception of Andrew Thomas, almost ALL of those moves have been duds.
This isn’t targeted at you, but the talking heads love to spew about how teams just need to invest in the lines, as if it’s as easy as just putting a pile of money on the table and BOOM, it’s fixed. Investing isn’t enough to have success. Teams need to make investments that pay out, and that is some HARD #&%# to pull off.
This is also the best counter to the argument of “Why bother rolling the dice on a new QB pick if he’ll just get killed behind the same shitty OL?”
I think you hit on why we think OLs are getting worse when you mentioned pass protection being more common. If your job is reactive and in plain view, the finger of blame tends to point at you. Pass blocking means you’re no longer forming a big dust cloud of dudes but rather trying to form a neat little pocket for the QB to throw from, so it’s simply easier to see when and where things go wrong.
This can also be applied to other positions that tend to get more or less blame than others. The DEs and DTs rarely get blamed unless they’re out there Haynesworthing. LBs might get a little side-eye if the slow-mo replay shows them running away from the obvious gap that an RB just blasted through. And DBs seem to get a ton of ire when they let a guy through.
Now that I think of it, the higher risk-reward profile of pass plays is also a factor. If a pass play goes wrong, you’re getting sacked or your QB is throwing a pick in pressure, both very bad outcomes that make you want to pull out the torches and pitchforks. If a run play goes sour, 9 times out of 10 it’s just a loss of a down, which is only enough to inspire bitter disappointment.
These are all good points and all contribute to teams having a bad Oline and them being bad in general. Like most things in life, despite what the news and social media say, are complicated and don’t have an easy answer or bad guy.
How do you quantify the value of an offensive lineman?
Dan Neil, OL for the Broncos when they won the Super Bowl in the 1990s, described playing OL as “the last stop before the stands.” People on the OL know that they are there because they aren’t athletic enough to play any other position.
So I don’t think the lack of glamour of the position is a factor; these are guys who at this point know that, if they’re going to play football at all, this is their chance.
Everything else you listed is great, though.
It’s also such a weird position to develop. Very seldom do OL develop linearly. Lane Johnson came in and was fine, but REALLY came into his own a few seasons later. Speaking from my own team, the Vikings: Garrett Bradbury was dogshit for three years. He was constantly getting thrown aside and bullied at the LOS. Ed Ingram was one of the worst guards in all of football last year, even famously stepping on Kirk Cousins on MULTIPLE occasions. Now, they’re both playing incredibly well, maybe top-10 at their respective positions, with Bradbury not allowing a single sack so far this season…..go figure….
I’ll also add that there’s so little actual recognition for OL in general. Nobody pays attention so generally the media just has their top guys and they repeatedly get all of the accolades. So why bust your butt when no matter how well you play, they’re just going to give any awards to the usual names.
It’s also such a weird position to develop. Very seldom do OL develop linearly. Lane Johnson came in and was fine, but REALLY came into his own a few seasons later. Speaking from my own team, the Vikings: Garrett Bradbury was dogshit for three years. He was constantly getting thrown aside and bullied at the LOS. Ed Ingram was one of the worst guards in all of football last year, even famously stepping on Kirk Cousins on MULTIPLE occasions. Now, they’re both playing incredibly well, maybe top-10 at their respective positions, with Bradbury not allowing a single sack so far this season…..go figure….
I’ll also add that there’s so little actual recognition for OL in general. Nobody pays attention so generally the media just has their top guys and they repeatedly get all of the accolades. So why bust your butt when no matter how well you play, they’re just going to give any awards to the usual names.
Your paragraph quoting that lineman about pass blocking being really hard really resonates with me. I agree that a lot of football has become very pass-happy, and I’m inclined to think it’s deliberate. While having a good run game can help a team excel, it doesn’t translate to exciting TV. The average audience prefers big pass plays than endlessly seeing guys squish in the middle for a few years at a time. As such, the game is tweaked to cater to what will sell more cable packages and the like.
This is why I love the North Dakota State Bison so much: they play it oldschool, with a solid run game and a quality offensive line. This year they haven’t been great, but in the past, they definitely prided themselves on their A-gap run plays and massive Time of Possession stats (and I admit I’m probably peculiar for enjoying watching this kind of football). However, they are able to get away with it because they’re on a lower tier of play. To try and assemble a team like that at the pro level would be not only difficult, but could also result in lower TV ratings, even if the team won more. The games would become too “boring” to watch.
Gotta get as many eyes on the screen watching all those beer commercials, after all.