Al Michaels Cracks A Joke
Al Michaels had a bit too much to drink this past Sunday night!
So in case you turned off the Giants/Broncos game early (as expected, because no one expected that result), you may have missed Al Michaels make a little snicker doodle comparing the Giants nightmare week to Harvey Weinstein’s Nightmare week. Yup, comparing a bad week for a sports team with injuries is sure a good comparison to a predator who is finally being unearthed for the monster he is. That sure went over well. Everyone kinda wen’t “woah dude” and then he apologized a short time later.
I’m the kind of individual who is not really offended by jokes. Never have been. I don’t really believe in “too soon” or “Some things are too offensive to joke about”. I think absolutely everything can be joked about, it is just that some topics require a higher level of contextual awareness and proper care to make the joke the right way otherwise you’re just an edgelord asshole. To make an extreme example, I’m not going to go up to people I don’t know very well and make a rape joke. But among close friends? Or to a very specific audience that understands who I am and am not advocating rape or being insensitive? I think that’s okay.
Everything is offensive to somebody. I don’t make a lot of particularly edgy jokes here, but a fair amount of comics could easily be seen as offensive to some people. I make lots of suicide jokes. Hell this very comic could be seen as offensive to alcoholics. It’s impossible to please everybody and to try would result in a comic so bland even puns would seem edgy. Considering how much humor is really meant to take in the absurdity of life, to push some boundaries, and in many instances a coping mechanism, telling someone else that NO JOKES ALLOWED kind of misses their point. Humor is subjective. I can’t stand people who get really angry at comedians, especially ones like Daniel Tosh or Anthony Jeselnik, for telling edgy jokes. That’s kind of their entire thing, you have to view the joke in context of the performer they are. They make a name out of riding that line between tasteless and funny.
That said, that doesn’t mean people do not deserve criticism and that those who are offended’s feelings don’t count. Tosh and other successful edgy comedians work because they are good at it, and a lot of people just tell offensive jokes with no creativity then tell anyone bothered that they are an SJW or some stupid nonsense for thinking it’s bad. Both the joke teller and the joke audience have a responsibility to meet halfway and I’m also not a fan of when someone who went pretty far basically blames everyone mad for “not getting it”, like they get a free pass for being insensitive. Those feelings still count, and an apology is warranted I think. I’m more willing to forgive someone who admits maybe the joke wasn’t great instead of someone who just basically calls people who don’t like it prudes and doubles down.
Like I said above, context and situational awareness is very important when you want to get a little risky with your humor. I wasn’t offended by Al Michael’s Weinstein crack, but I completely understand why people were, and I agree that it shouldn’t have been said. That’s a twitter shitpost kinda joke, not the joke you want to hear from the premiere play-by-play announcer during a primetime game. That wasn’t the place or person for that joke. Michaels should have been smarter than that and he deserved to get called out.
We all make jokes that bother someone. It happens. I think when someone does screw it up, they probably deserve some of the blame they get. But unless this is a pattern of behavior it really shouldn’t be considered a huge offense. Sometimes we just make jokes that don’t land. I don’t think any less of Al Michaels for the joke, I think he just made a mistake.
Edit: I tried something different and wrote the blog post first instead of last, and apparently hit “post” instead of “save draft” and that’s why some of you saw this post without the comic yesterday. Serves me right for breaking routine.
Commentary without comics? I’m not sure about this.
I suspect this is the commentary that is going to the comic that is coming up in about 8 hours.
Yeah, wrote the draft first and must have hit publish instead of save
*POTENTIAL CONTROVERY INTENSIFIES*
.
.
.
This comic better offend me, and that’s a challenge.
Agreed.
The lack of comic triggers me. Where’s my safe space Dave?
🙁
Dave took down the comic on my account. I have an intense sensitivity to jokes about people making jokes.
Dave how dare you have an opinion about a controversial subject and not conform to MY sense of morality. Who do you think you are, a person with free will?
In all seriousness, meh shitty jokes are shitty jokes. How long until Al Michaels sex scandal breaks is the real question….
69 days.
Let’s hope there isn’t a sex tape…
I really dont understand why Al Michaels got so much flak for this. He realised literally as he said it that it was probably a bad idea, which is why he made the point that he just reads the sheets he’s given (so he didn’t even think of the joke, its not something from his brain). I reckon its expecting too much for a commentator to both do their job, and censor the material they are given to read out. Sure, it was a mistake by someone that that joke made it into the broadcast, but that someone isn’t Al Michaels.
If he does read note cards that’s honestly a bummer, I liked thinking the announcers aren’t scripted
if that was scripted, man how did that one get past the proofreaders?
Thats at least what he said in the broadcast, I assume its mostly that he is given bits of trivia/updates to read.
ji
Lol
I pretty much agree with you here. I’m not the type to say “Never joke about Subject X”, but there are subjects where the degree of difficulty in having the joke land properly is probably not worth the attempt unless you’re a professional comedian.
It’s a really tough balance and even if you’re known for it you still have to play it right and respect that some people aren’t going to be happy about it.
I think that setting is the important thing.
If you’re at an edgy comedian’s show and get offended at a joke, you’re in the wrong place, and it’s pretty much your fault for getting offended. It’s like getting offended at South Park or Cyanide and Happiness – if you’re thin-skinned, why are you even there?
If you’re watching a show that’s supposed to be for all audiences and get offended at a joke, I’m more likely to criticize the person making the joke because people aren’t expecting that kind of humor with their mainstream football commentary.
Is Cris Collingsworth just Al Michael’s babysitter at this point.
Also, Hollywood is full of Weinstein-type scumbags, he’s just the tip of iceberg.
Tosh and Jeselnik ARE tasteless and unfunny though. You should have at least picked someone funny.
Tosh is hit or miss but Jeselnik is fucking hilarious, gonna agree to disagree on that one
Yeah, Jeselnik is great. For those not aware, he actually had an official podcast on NFL.com two years ago with his best friend growing up, Greg Rosenthal, one of their main writers, called the Rosenthall-Jeselnik Vanity Project. No offense to Intentional Sounding, but that remains my favorite podcast of all-time. It was absolutely hilarious. Highly recommend looking it up and giving it a listen.
How are they tasteless and unfunny?
I mean, I totally see why someone would think so
I think the tastelessness is part of the appeal but it’s not for everyone
I get having rouble in the pass game even with Emmanuel and Demariyus as WR’s but letting Orleans fucking Darkwa destroy you when you’ve held RB’s like Zeke under 50 is deserving of a loss, the biggest loss since Harvey Weinstein’s credibility!
No I’m not sorry for how forced that was.
Or Devin Faraci’s…not that he had much to begin with.
yeah, weinstein wssn’t sorry for how forced it was either….
I appreciated it
This reminds me of an old South Park episode where the kids were getting crushed on school football game and the commentator made all those inappropriate jokes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tFYTiOOA6U
I thought the joke was funny. Yeah, its kind of in poor taste, but that doesn’t bother me. Weinstein and Hollywood elitists who knew about this DESERVE to be made fun of.
This, it was hilarious. Me and the guys I was watching with all about choked on our beer laughing when he said it.
I think the problem with the joke is it implies you think Weinstein was unfortunate, rather than loathsome.
It doesn’t imply that though. Weinstein is having a bad week and it’s of his own doing. The joke was hilarious but butthurt individuals made a huge fuss about it.
I think it’s kinda shitty to call people who didn’t like the joke butthurt just because you thought it was funny. I mean I thought it was kinda funny too, but poorly timed and from the wrong person and I have zero issue with people who found it tasteless. It compared a football team to a sexual predator in a way that made the team the target of the joke and not the predator. I completely understand why people didn’t like it even if it didn’t bother me.
Here’s my philosophy (which is probably why I am a Libertarian), if I doesn’t directly call out or make fun of a clear victim, then it flies with me. At worst this joke was edgy. “Let’s face it, the Giants are coming off a worse week than Harvey Weinstein and they’re up 14 points”. Harvey Weinstein has had a bad week because he’s just been ousted as a dude who sexually assaults women. I fail to see who this could even offend. Al Michael isn’t making fun or demeaning the women Weinstein sexually assaulted. Just my opinion.
ok but you’re making the dick move of somehow equating your own perspective with that of being objectively correct. what is that “just my opinion” coda, an edgy joke of your own?
your perspective is fine, whatever, but don’t conflate your view on reality with reality itself
The joke offends people because it diminishes the horrible impact of Weinstein. It takes a very real predator who ruined lives, and then diminishes the impact of that weight by saying a football team with some injuries was worse. It indirectly diminishes the impact of his crimes. Obviously, that was the joke, and that’s what you found funny. Finding that funny is perfectly acceptable.
But the fact that you can’t understand why anyone (especially victims of this type of shit) could be bothered by dismissing the horror for a cheap joke is kinda messed up. You don’t have to agree, but at least understand where they are coming from.
And at the very minimum, it’s not an appropriate joke for the situation it was told in
Ok, I think I didn’t elucidate my point. I can understand why victims of sexual assault would react negatively to a joke about Weinstein’s ACTIONS. But the joke was squarely on Weinstein. Yes, the joke was inappropriate because of the audience but I fail to see how it diminishes the actions of Weinstein. The joke was aimed at how Weinstein went from Hollywood mogul to outed sexual predator, not against his victims. And in my opinion at the end of my earlier post wasn’t a joke, it’s just how I view the situation and to underscore how I am in no way saying my views are the absolute truth or even correct.
But I also look skeptically at some of these actresses and actors coming out against Weinstein. Many of the actors and actresses knew about his sexual assaults, yet didn’t say anything because they wanted him to fund their movies so they could profit financially. Also, some of the actresses took out of court settlements and payouts, rather than outing him earlier. I don’t understand why we don’t hear any outrage about them, rather than blasting Al Michaels…
I didn’t mind the joke. Hell, no joke offends me. However, it comes down to knowing your audience.
Sounds like a challenge
I never thought a football webcomic would express so perfectly what I’ve been trying to say for years
barves are shit
fucking falcons are shit
what is the point
The Alt text!